Budget Committee Meeting ~ February 2, 2023
Second night of budget committee deliberations on the 2023 town budget; the administration and fire department budgets had been voted on the Tuesday. The committee questioned Calvin, who runs public works, on cemetery mowing, tree cutting and a fuel line that had been revised upward from $40,000 to $56,000, then moved a public works operating budget of $1,338,920. It reopened Tuesday's administration vote after the town manager, Jerry, produced a corrected sheet, and recommended $538,624. It then worked through the remaining accounts (animal control, assessing, cemeteries, conservation and recreation, the Eureka Center, solid waste, bulky waste day, planning, telecommunications, general assistance and debt service) and the capital and funding articles. On two funding articles it departed from the select board: $50,000 rather than $100,000 for the public works reserve, and $230,000 rather than $200,000 from the undesignated fund balance. Several votes are announced only as a tally or in words the recogniser garbled, so their outcomes are recorded here as unclear.
No written minutes could be matched to this meeting. The transcript records that the speaker changed but never who was speaking, so any name attached to a statement below is inferred from context and is marked (?).
What was discussed
- 0:02Opening and introductions
Milt Simon, chair of the committee, opened at 6:33 pm and said this was the second night of deliberating the 2023 town budget. Members gave their names and roads: Jane Rice, Bowie Hill Road; Heather Roy, Hallowell Road; Neil Berry, Stackpole Road; John Talbot, Stackpole Road; Rod Stimson, Emerson Road. Public works and all remaining items were left for this night.
- 0:02Whether public works should take over cemetery mowing
Animal control, assessing and cemeteries sit in their own tab, but there had been talk of the cemeteries moving to public works, which is contracted out at $4,500. A member said the list runs to 14 or 15 cemeteries, that one takes about four men two and a half hours four times a year, and that the crew would have to buy mowers and weed whackers. Calvin (?) said he had not yet located all of them and suggested trying it for one year.
- 10:23Tree cutting line 4006
A member said the note supporting the $4,000 request is word for word the same as last year's (both add $1,500 for a more aggressive vegetation management plan) and that no money has been spent. Calvin (?) said the contractor never got to the work; $2,500 was budgeted in 2022 and dead trees have since been added to the job.
- 15:25Fuel line revised from $40,000 to $56,000
Calvin (?) said he built the original request off the wrong spreadsheet and issued a revised proposal on January 27. Using 12,000 gallons of diesel and 1,750 gallons of gasoline at current prices he reached $57,116 and asked for $56,000, with no cushion built in. He said last year was cheap through April under a GPCOG contract and expensive after it ran out.
- 21:22Select board approved the lower fuel figure; two corrections
The select board approved the public works bottom line with fuel at about $40,000, so the revision has to go back to them. The uniform and clothing line still shows $2,000 rather than the $1,800 Calvin (?) said he would enter, and janitorial wages are requested at $1,500 against $1,044 spent, which Calvin attributed to time off by the previous cleaner.
- 26:40Unexpended 2022 balance and motion on the operating budget
Members asked about roughly $90,000 shown as unexpended in the 2022 public works budget. Calvin (?) said paving the contractor could not get to accounts for most of it and the figure would have been nearer $40,000 had the work been done. A motion followed to approve the public works operating budget at $1,338,920, seconded by Rod.
- 31:49Debate over cutting the public works budget
A member addressed as Bill (?) set out three years of underspending ($29,502 in 2020, $48,362 in 2021, $90,057 on paper in 2022) and said he would vote against and follow with a motion to reduce. Others said a one to four percent margin is good management, that unspent money returns to the taxpayers, and that most of the roughly $88,000 increase is wages, paving, salt up 21.85 percent and fuel up 55 percent.
- 42:08Stream crossing and culvert replacements
A motion to appropriate and transfer $50,000 from the public works capital reserve fund. The project is budgeted at $300,000: $101,000 raised last year, a $150,000 DEP grant that is not a match, and this $50,000. Calvin (?) said the Army Corps changed its permitting and design criteria after the first design, and both streams were reclassified as contributing to Atlantic salmon critical habitat; the new design has been permitted.
- 47:54Public works capital reserve balance questioned
A member said that after the transfers and the proposed $100,000 raise were filtered out, the capital reserve appeared to come to zero, and asked for clarity before voting money out of it. The answer was that the balances have only recently been settled with the auditor and that the one-ton truck is coming from ARPA, not the reserve.
- 53:04One-ton plow truck from ARPA funds
$105,000 of American Rescue Plan money for a one-ton plow truck, the price being a dealership quote. The 2008 truck is not being traded in and will be run to exhaustion; the CIP committee asked that it be made clear the new truck is not on a replacement schedule. Leasing was raised and set aside because a chassis still has to be outfitted with plow gear and a sander.
- 58:08Public works reserve held over; Calvin excused
The $100,000 the select board recommended for the public works reserve was held until the committee had discussed the undesignated fund, one member saying he would rather cover both that and the higher solid waste figure from undesignated funds. Calvin left at this point.
- 58:08Revised administration budget sheet
Jerry handed out a revised administration budget; the change was a code enforcement officer raise that had been left out, worth a little under $3,000. Because the committee had already voted the administration budget on Tuesday, it had to decide whether to reopen it.
- 1:03:31Whether a line may be overspent if the article total holds
Members pressed Jerry on whether savings in one line can pay for another, and specifically whether money left by a vacancy can raise the offer to a new hire. Jerry (?) said invoices are charged to the line they belong to, that the article total is the limit, and that hiring is not black and white. Members said the 2022 labor line was overspent by about $13,000 to pay staff and that this now carries forward; percentage increases of 12, 13 and 23 were quoted for the labor line and the administration budget.
- 1:19:14Exchange over Tuesday's contingency handout
Jerry (?) said he had been handed the chair's contingency paperwork only at Tuesday's meeting and called that unprofessional and disrespectful. John (?) said the discussion was moving into personal views and asked to get back to the purpose of the meeting; the chair said the paperwork was his argument to the committee and had not been aimed at the manager.
- 1:24:54Administration budget reopened and re-voted
Mark (?) moved and Jill (?) seconded to revisit the recommendation taken on Tuesday, because the revised budget changed the bottom line. Neil then moved and John (?) seconded $538,624, which keeps the committee's removal of the $15,000 contingency line. A member who had arrived after the earlier vote, Joe (?), abstained to avoid an even number.
- 1:30:06Animal control
$18,600 for animal control services. A member said the $50 fee to reclaim a pet from the shelter has risen in neighbouring towns and Durham may want to look at its own; the fee also helps cover emergency veterinary care, which a clinic must provide and bill to the town.
- 1:35:21Assessing and cemeteries accounts
$21,000 for assessing, including the assessor's tax map updating before the data goes to GIS; she asked to stay flat this year but said to expect more next year. $450 for the cemeteries account, which pays for the flags.
- 1:41:05Conservation, parks and recreation
The account was proposed at $7,880 with the historic preservation request moved to planning. A member found River Park needed a sign but had nothing budgeted, since Jerry had removed it on the basis that a recreation fund of about $20,000 to $23,000 could pay. The committee added $1,500 back, taking River Park maintenance to $1,700 and the account to $9,380, on the understanding it is to be transferred rather than raised.
- 2:03:30Eureka Center
$6,535. Members asked again about a door that appears to have been budgeted more than once and still has not been replaced; the cost was guessed at about $1,500 and no one could confirm it. Janitorial wages were raised to about $1,060 on the expectation of more use; the hall rents for $50.
- 2:03:30Solid waste contract and Casella extension
Jerry (?) said he found the Casella contract ends June 30, and rather than go out to bid in the middle of budget season the town took a one-year extension at the same price. Disposal is $90.99 a ton and recycling $177 a ton. Splitting the year gives $161,082.97 for January to June plus $198,712 for the extension, or $359,794.97.
- 2:19:38Solid waste vote and the future of curbside collection
The committee settled on $370,000 plus $2,540 for tags, a figure of $372,540. A member said the account is approaching the size of the administration and fire budgets, that many towns no longer offer curbside pickup, and asked what a transfer station arrangement would cost; several agreed the question needs a wider discussion at town level, not at the budget committee.
- 2:25:05Bulky waste day
Casella quoted $1,700 an hour with no stated minimum. Seven hours comes to $11,900 and eight hours to $13,600; the select board recommended $12,000. Members debated how long the day runs and kept it as a separate article so residents can vote it up or down.
- 2:36:08Planning
$46,420. The historic preservation commission asked for $3,200; Jerry cut it to $2,000 because the commission has money left, and Neil (?) proposed applying the $1,330 sitting in a historic district commission fund so only $670 is raised. Members asked why planning carries its own legal line separate from administration; the answer was that planning-related legal opinions are charged there.
- 2:47:07Telecommunications
$52,000, most of the 11.27 percent increase being secretarial pay moved in from planning. The IT staff, Devin and Kim, are budgeted at 20 hours a week each and will cover the town office counter and meetings. A member said she has asked for three years whether the town is contractually obliged to keep the public access channel and offered to make the call herself.
- 2:52:10General assistance and debt service
$600 for general assistance, described as a placeholder because the state reimburses approved claims; a separate Durham heating fund holds $11,245. The debt service motion was stated once as $980,862 and otherwise as $958,394.
- 2:57:26Future assessing and market revaluation reserve
$60,000 was recommended. A member traced the municipal capital account from $97,632 on January 1, 2022, through the $60,000 revaluation appropriation and $7,120 for a copier to a balance of $30,512, and asked where the $60,000 went since the revaluation was not done. Jerry (?) said it went back into undesignated funds and will have to be taken out and put back. The revaluation is estimated at $150,000 to $200,000 and is being aimed at 2025.
- 3:13:17Public works reserve cut to $50,000
Against the select board's recommended $100,000, members noted the reserve holds about $218,000 and that capital money can later be moved from the undesignated fund, and moved $50,000. The discussion covered the tax anticipation note, the roughly $800,000 a month the town spends, and a target of 16 to 17 percent of budget or two months of expenditure in undesignated funds, put at $1.36 to $1.5 million.
- 3:24:46Undesignated fund balance
The select board recommended appropriating $200,000 from undesignated to reduce the amount raised by taxes; the committee took it to $230,000 to cover the fuel revision and the higher solid waste figure. Members noted $137,280 of last year's unspent money returned to undesignated and that the $200,000 was not closely reasoned. Several warned that about $275,000 of ARPA money is holding this year's taxes down and will not be there next year.
- 3:35:50Remaining funding articles
Motions covered general and intergovernmental revenues not otherwise dedicated, transfers of up to $9,380 from the recreation assigned fund and up to $52,000 from the telecommunications assigned fund, $14,344.90 from undesignated to cover the 2022 solid waste overrun and $8,638.71 to cover the 2022 fire department overrun.
- 3:41:01Proposal for a public question session on the budget
A member said residents who cannot sit through four-hour meetings have no chance to ask questions about the budget, and proposed the committee hold a question and answer session before town meeting, as the planning board does for land use. Others said it was worth trying and would not need a full quorum.
What was decided
- 37:03Raise and appropriate $1,338,920 for the public works operating budget; the chair's count was given as six to onepassed
- 47:54Appropriate and transfer $50,000 from the public works capital reserve fund for stream crossing and culvert replacements, moved by Jill and seconded by Neil; the chair's words after 'all those in favor' are garbled in the recordingoutcome unclear
- 53:04Appropriate $105,000 of ARPA funds for the purchase of a one-ton plow truck for public works; no result is audible after the vote is calledoutcome unclear
- 1:24:54Revisit the administration budget recommendation voted on Tuesday, moved by Mark and seconded by Jillpassed
- 1:24:54Raise and appropriate $538,624 for the administration operating budget, moved by Neil and seconded by John; the chair announced four in favour, three opposed and one abstentionpassed
- 1:30:06Raise $18,600 for animal control servicespassed
- 1:35:21Raise $21,000 for assessing, moved by John and seconded by Heather; the chair's words after the vote is called are garbledoutcome unclear
- 1:35:21Raise $450 towards the cemetery account; the recording gives no result after the vote is calledoutcome unclear
- 1:58:05Appropriate $9,380 for the conservation, parks and recreation account, moved by Heather and seconded by Jillpassed
- 2:03:30Appropriate $6,535 for the Durham Eureka Center account, moved by John and seconded by Neil; announced as passing seven to onepassed
- 2:19:38Appropriate $372,540 for the solid waste account, moved by John and seconded by Neil; the chair's words after the vote is called are garbledoutcome unclear
- 2:30:30Appropriate $12,000 towards a bulky waste day, moved by Jill and seconded by Heather; the tally was given as seven to one and then corrected to six to two, without saying which side held the majorityoutcome unclear
- 2:36:08Appropriate $46,420 for the planning budget; seven hands were counted in favour and the planning board chair abstained because he receives a stipendpassed
- 2:52:10Appropriate $52,000 towards the telecommunications account; no result is clearly statedoutcome unclear
- 2:52:10Appropriate $600 for the general assistance account, moved by Jill and seconded by John; no result is clearly statedoutcome unclear
- 2:52:10Appropriate money towards the debt payment schedule, moved by Jill and seconded by Neil; the amount is given as $958,394 in the chair's restatements and once as $980,862, and no result is clearly statedoutcome unclear
- 3:08:15Raise and appropriate $60,000 for future assessing and market revaluation reserves, moved by John and seconded by Rodpassed
- 3:18:41Raise and appropriate $50,000 for the public works reserve account rather than the $100,000 the select board recommended, moved by Neil and seconded by John; announced as seven in favour and one againstpassed
- 3:30:37Allow the select board to appropriate $230,000 from the undesignated fund balance towards the 2023 budget, reducing the amount raised from property taxes, moved by John and seconded by Neil; the tally was given as six to twopassed
- 3:35:50Appropriate all general and intergovernmental revenues not dedicated or otherwise appropriated to reduce the tax commitment; no result is clearly statedoutcome unclear
- 3:35:50Allow the select board to transfer up to $9,380 from the recreation assigned fund and up to $52,000 from the telecommunications assigned fund towards the 2023 conservation, parks and recreation and telecommunications budgets; no result is clearly statedoutcome unclear
- 3:35:50Appropriate $14,344.90 from the undesignated fund balance to cover solid waste spending above the approved 2022 budget, moved by John and seconded by Jill; no result is clearly statedoutcome unclear
- 3:41:01Appropriate $8,638.71 from the undesignated fund balance to cover fire department spending above the approved 2022 budget, moved by Neil and seconded by Jill; no result is clearly statedoutcome unclear
An outcome reads "unclear" where the recording does not state it plainly. The recogniser drops short words, and "the motion does not carry" is one missing word from its opposite.
Worth knowing
- 15:25The public works fuel request went from $40,000 to $56,000 after Calvin found he had built it off the wrong spreadsheet. He gave actual use as 12,000 gallons of diesel and 1,750 gallons of gasoline; diesel was quoted at $4.36 a gallon at one point in the discussion and $4.67 at another, and gasoline at $2.71. The select board approved the lower figure, so it goes back to them.
- 31:49Public works has come in under budget three years running: $29,502 in 2020, $48,362 in 2021 and $90,057 on paper in 2022. Calvin (?) said the 2022 figure would have been about $40,000 had the paving contractor done the work. One member used this to argue for cutting the budget; the motion carried anyway.
- 2:03:30Solid waste costs $90.99 a ton to dispose of and $177 a ton to recycle. A member put the extra cost of recycling at about $21,600 a year and said the account is approaching the size of the administration and fire department budgets. The Casella contract ends June 30 and has been extended one year at the same price rather than going out to bid.
- 2:57:26The $60,000 appropriated in 2022 for the market revaluation was never spent, and went back into the undesignated fund rather than staying in the municipal capital account, which now shows $30,512. The committee asked that it be put back before another $60,000 is raised. The revaluation is estimated at $150,000 to $200,000 and is being aimed at 2025.
Motion language found in the transcript
Located by pattern matching, with no model involved: "I move that", "I'll second", "all those in favour". This is an independent check on the summary above: 12 passages of motion language, against 23 decisions summarised.
Show the 12 passages
- 56:20everything already on it for 105 000 with a plow yeah yeah okay all right Mr chairman yes sir I move that the we vote to appropriate 105 000 from the Opera funds received by the town from the generous people in Washington · vote language: all those in favor
- 1:25:40the philosophy behind the budget committee's recommended amount was removal of the contingency line of fifteen thousand but now currently because the new budget presented to us went up by a little over three thousand twenty seven a little under three thousand um the line that the budget committee recommended is now greater than fifteen thousand or less yeah so so if we're going to move forward I would first need a motion to rescind the · vote language: abstain, all those in favor
- 1:27:19five thirty eight six two four okay so I move that we appropriate 538 624 for administration okay so it's been moved by Neil and seconded by John that the town uh races and appropriates 538 624 dollars towards the administrative operational fund discussion · vote language: abstain, all those in favor, opposed
- 1:28:32it up about taking that and cutting that 15 000 in half so I guess if you're gonna make this vote here you've either got to vote it up or down and then revisit whether you wanted to take and I didn't hear that discussion it made that made that recommendation it was mentioned the other night something about maybe splitting it from 15 to 75. I don't remember that I heard it from somebody so why are you bringing it on huh are you in favor of that I think he's trying to get us to a number right no no no we gotta vote this one up or down and thanks voted down then you can bring in another motion to · vote language: all those in favor, opposed
- 1:36:43um assessing the select board has approved the town raising 21 thousand dollars [Music] Twenty One what do you get oh right here okay got it under department 19 middle of the page I'll make a motion that we approve eight twenty one thousand dollars for assessing oh second it's been moved by John and seconded by Heather that the town raises twenty one thousand dollars for assessing any discussions ah I keep I the mapping thing I keep · vote language: all those in favor
- 1:46:45so if I was if I'm understanding correctly if I was to make a motion to use the reserve the Recreation Reserve fund balance and to cover this I would need to increase it by 1500 to cover the sign so I where it's a reserve fund I you you folks might know better than me can you take it out of there so that's what I was just going to say is that what we've been asked to do is just put a number in so if we don't want to put a number in there because we have a different plan of where we want that to come from but the number is sitting here but there's a number in there for Public Works yes their Re
- 1:51:34bear with me apparently there are some funds that you have to put towards something and thanks to that number he wrote that on that number and I'm not even that in Telecom right and I'm and I'm not even really sure why it can't be listed with all the revenue I I don't know it is listed with all the revenue okay it is in his okay thingama Bob that's what most towns do is they just list the revenue because I mean what if you're going to fund an article on what difference does it make if you take it out of your lap pocket of your right pocket right right well I mean we definitely would rather tra
- 2:29:55was a length of time either and you open it by three yeah that's what the times used today eight to three yeah that's 11 000 900 and they recommend 12. I think it has cost us ten thousand dollars in the past and I think they just upped it because the price of everything has gone up that's what my recollection so I make a motion to appropriate twelve thousand · vote language: all in favor, opposed
- 2:52:10should be made yeah yeah we know how many ads of the townspeople have been putting on there I know some of the non-profits put stuff on there it's really boring when there's not a meeting going on yeah I I just want to know if we are under a contractual obligation to keep it and if it's contractual if it's legality we'll look into it okay absolutely okay Mr chairman yes sir I move we uh appropriate fifty two thousand dollars for Telecommunications second · vote language: all those in favor
- 3:34:31and second is that the Town allows the boat of Selectmen to appropriate two hundred and thirty thousand dollars from undesignated fund balance to be used toward the 2023 budget appropriation thereby decreasing the amount to be raised from property all those all those improved all those opposed vote is one two three four five six to two what would you have done I think it's too much [Music] um I'm gonna attempt this just to make the wording less I'm making motion to see if the town will vote to appropriate all General and intergovernmental revenues receive that are not dedicated or otherwise ap · vote language: all those in favor, opposed
- 3:35:50sort of thing okay a second okay will withdraw by second if you want to be the one but if Bill wrote down my name so it's tired any discussion seeing none let's go to vote I make a motion to see if the town will vote to allow the board of Selectmen to transfer up to hitting pause seven thousand eight · vote language: all those in favor
- 3:38:54yo it's in the the thing that Kevin sent us this could be changed on the top floor this isn't a done deal yeah I'm confused so that 230 that 16 000 to 25 200 wasn't that to cover like uh that's the difference between the older girls but they only overspent so we have to improve it I will make a motion to do what you just said wait for a second my second all right so it was moved by John and seconded by Jill that the town allows uh that the town appropriates 14 · vote language: all those in favor, opposed
Elsewhere
Source & method
Town of Durham meeting recordings, YouTube auto-captions, and the town's written minutes
Captions cleaned into timestamped transcripts; topics and motions found by pattern matching; summaries written by a language model and required to cite the second each item begins. Every name attached to speech is checked against the attendance list in the minutes, and marked (?) where no record confirms it
https://www.youtube.com/@durhammaine/videos
Summary written by claude-opus-5. No minutes matched.
Data as of 25 August 2026 (the date of the newest recorded meeting in the index); retrieved 2 September 2026.
