Select Board Meeting & Workshop ~ May 7, 2024
A short Select Board meeting on May 7, 2024, followed by a workshop bringing the town's boards and committees together to state their goals for the year. Three residents used public comment to object to the resource protection rezoning that took effect after the 2023 town meeting, disputing the evidence for a Blanding's turtle population in Durham. The board approved a request for proposals for legal services after the town attorney told the town manager the firm would stop providing services after May 31, and firms that submit are expected at the May 28 meeting. The board also added the AP warrant, the payroll warrant and the April 23 minutes to the consent agenda, accepted the consent agenda, and adjourned at 6:40pm. In the workshop the Conservation Commission, Historic District Commission, Planning Board and Solid Waste Committee each presented priorities, select board members gave their own, and the board said it will set policy objectives for each group at its next meeting.
What was discussed
- 0:22Call to order
Joe Roy called the meeting to order at 6:03pm on May 7, noting a late start caused by technical difficulties with the video feed. No amendments to the agenda were offered at that point.
- 0:22Public comment: John Benedict on resource protection
John Benedict, of Runaround Pond Road at the corner of Route 9, said most of his property was rezoned into resource protection after last year's town meeting and that the process relied on inaccurate data about the Blanding's turtle. He said no trapping survey or research was done to verify the turtle's presence, and that his land is now treated as a town nature preserve with no tax reduction or compensation.
- 6:04Public comment: Jeffrey DeWitt
Jeffrey DeWitt, of 96 Runaround Pond Road, said landowners want the town to stay rural but feel their questions at the earlier meetings were shut down. He said neighbours have spent their own money on work they could have done had they not been placed in resource protection.
- 6:04Public comment: Lois Kilby-Chesley on turtle records
Lois Kilby-Chesley, of Runaround Pond Road, said she filed a freedom of access request with Inland Fisheries and Wildlife and was told there is no sustainable Blanding's turtle population in Durham. She described a single turtle identified from a photograph in the early 2000s and nothing since.
- 11:08New business: RFP for legal services
Jerry Douglass said the town attorney telephoned to say the firm is closing and will provide no services after May 31, so the town must go out for new counsel. He circulated a draft RFP adapted from ones used by other Maine towns, with a requirement that any firm submitting a proposal attend the May 28 meeting to answer questions.
- 16:29RFP timing and board review
Jerry Douglass said he would put the RFP out this week for a two-week response period, and confirmed the board would see the proposals before the firms appear on May 28. Josh Klein-Golden said the town should not be without an attorney for any period of time.
- 16:29Manager report: legal records and paving
Jerry Douglass said he collected the town's legal documents from the current attorney's office and will pass the box to whichever firm is appointed. He also said paving of Auburn Pownal Road should be pulled because a Central Maine Power project will haul heavy equipment over it, and recommended carrying the paving money to next year rather than returning it to undesignated fund balance.
- 21:34CMP project, road bond and paving alternatives
The board asked whether another road could be paved instead this year; Jerry Douglass said the contractor bid on a straight 2.4-mile stretch and remobilising elsewhere would change the price. He said CMP is posting a million dollar bond, the road will be filmed before and after, and the project could take up to a year depending on permitting.
- 21:34Parking at Rabbit Road, Runaround Pond Road and Route 9
Jerry Douglass reported that the code enforcement officer reached the property owner and told her the parking must stop, with a violation to follow, because the access is unpermitted and the intersection is a safety hazard. He said the animal control officer had also informed the state.
- 21:34GPCOG delegates and town office trees
GPCOG has asked the town to name three delegates for the year; Jerry Douglass asked the board to decide and it was put on next week's agenda. He also reported a quote of $3,500 to cut down the ten pine trees in front of the town office, some of which are dead or hollow, with wires running between two of them.
- 27:09Proposed change of website vendor
Jerry Douglass proposed moving the town website to a Maine company, saying the town pays about $2,700 a year now and the new arrangement would be three years for $5,000, with staff able to edit content directly and agendas assembled automatically. Because it binds the town to a contract, the board asked that it go on next week's agenda so members could look at the example sites.
- 32:31Agenda amendment, consent agenda and adjournment
The board retroactively amended the agenda to add the AP warrant, the payroll warrant and the April 23 minutes to the consent agenda, then accepted the consent agenda and adjourned. It was also announced that the Solid Waste Committee will meet May 13 at 6:30 at the fire station.
- 38:55Workshop opening and introductions
Joe Roy opened the workshop as a round table, explaining that each board and committee would state its policy objectives for the year, the select board would ask clarifying questions and then give its own priorities, and the select board would set objectives for each group at the following meeting. Those present introduced themselves and the body they represent.
- 44:13Conservation Commission goals
The Conservation Commission said it will learn the following week whether it has been awarded the Maine Won't Wait climate action grant, which would fund a consultant to develop an open space plan identifying areas vulnerable to flooding and other events, priority conservation areas and a land conservation goal. Other priorities are a second phase of the solar ordinance with a siting map and possible mitigation fees, supporting updates to the resource protection zoning, and a joint research session with the Planning Board on battery storage.
- 49:40Conservation mechanisms and clarification on resource protection
The commission described voluntary mechanisms: the open space current use tax program, which it said only three people in town use, easements through the Royal River and Androscoggin land trusts, and mitigation fees from solar development redirected to conservation. Heather Roy asked that it be said plainly in public that the grant is separate from resource protection and is not a route to convert land into open space.
- 54:54Status of an agricultural commission
An agricultural commission is not yet formed. Heather Roy said a group came to the last board meeting with proposed bylaws and a charter, that the 2018 comprehensive plan recommends such a body, and that in her view its formation should be initiated by the select board as with the other commissions.
- 54:54Historic District Commission goals
Lois Kilby-Chesley, chair of the Durham Historic District Commission, distributed the five goals the commission set for 2024, drawn from the land use ordinances and the comprehensive plan: protecting historic resources, communicating more often with the community, working with other interested organisations, continuing work on the Union Church, and building a working relationship with town officials. She noted the town will not own the Union Church once the deed is drawn up, and that the commission is distinct from the Durham Historical Society.
- 1:00:50Ordinance edits and a proposed name change
The commission has been editing articles 5.14, 12 and 19 of the land use ordinance for two years and has held the work until 2025 so town staff can give input. A name change to reduce confusion with the Historical Society would require an article at town meeting; suggestions raised included Durham Heritage Preservation Commission and Durham Preservation Commission.
- 1:06:33Proposal to consolidate historic district permit review
Joe Tomm said the ordinance should be cleaned up so the Planning Board is responsible for approvals within the historic district and the commission acts in an advisory role, rather than an applicant needing to stop at two boards. Joe Roy held the discussion until after every group had presented.
- 1:11:40Historic building survey and select board attendance
Lois Kilby-Chesley said the Maine Historic Preservation Commission charge includes a survey of buildings over 100 years old; an informal photographic survey was done roughly a decade ago and would need redoing, at a cost she could not yet estimate. She also asked that a select board member attend commission meetings, saying the commission had been told at one point that no one from the board should attend.
- 1:17:01Planning Board priorities
The Planning Board chair said the board reviewed the town planner's list and, after a joint call with Conservation Commission members, set two high priorities: battery energy storage, which the town has no rules for and where developers have already made enquiries, and refinement of resource protection. Cell towers were deprioritised again, road standards were judged too complicated for this year, and the board flagged digital codification and a GPCOG study of the village area as work that will occupy the town planner.
- 1:22:40What battery storage means
Board members explained battery storage as large facilities holding electricity for periods of peak demand, with concerns about fire risk, visual impact, sound and the absence of an industrial zone in Durham. Figures given for one project were inconsistent, described both as five acres and as 156 forty-foot trailer-sized units.
- 1:22:40Solid Waste Committee direction
The committee chair said the committee has not met yet and its first job is to lay out a direction among the options: keeping the status quo under the existing five-year contract, a transfer facility, partnering with a neighbouring town such as Pownal, town collection through Public Works, ending roadside service, or reducing tonnage through recycling and composting. He said an unlicensed facility can only hold material for 30 days, and that he expects to bring a list back to the board with unrealistic options removed.
- 1:28:21What the board wants from the solid waste review
Board members said they want a cost benefit analysis of each option, with Heather Roy citing the Union Church committee's 200-page report as the model for a data-driven recommendation. Joe Roy said the town received only one response to its last RFP and wants to know the long-term options before committing to another five years.
- 1:38:54Law enforcement coverage
A participant asked how a new committee gets formed, citing a presentation by the Lisbon police chief about Durham having no law enforcement. Jerry Douglass said he has spoken with the sheriff's department, that two police chiefs from other communities live in town, and that he wants a separate meeting on what the town needs before costs are discussed, with a view to bringing it to the next town meeting.
- 1:44:33Select board comments on Conservation Commission priorities
Josh Klein-Golden said the grant should be the priority if awarded, and that the resource protection updates would address concerns raised in public comment. Heather Roy asked about the status of the earlier resiliency work with other towns and about support for residents during storms.
- 1:49:56Storm resiliency and warming centres
The Conservation Commission said warming centres and emergency flood response are beyond its capacity and charter, and the board agreed to place resiliency and public safety alongside law enforcement as needs without a home. Lois Kilby-Chesley said that when she asked about warming centres over a year ago she was directed to the fire chief as the public safety officer.
- 1:55:08Resource protection mapping as the board's first priority
Joe Roy said his number one objective for the Conservation Commission is addressing the changed resource protection mapping, since a state biologist has since done additional survey work producing data that was not available in 2018. He said that if new data shows a property was included in error he would support even a special town meeting to correct it.
- 2:00:32Communication and outreach
The board discussed the gap between the notices, mailings and public hearings that were held and residents saying they did not know they were affected. Figures given for responses to the commission's online survey conflicted, cited first as about 100 and then as 200, described either way as more than attended town meeting.
- 2:05:41Minutes and agendas not being posted
Lois Kilby-Chesley said she posts her commission's minutes and agendas but that other committees' are not on the website. Jerry Douglass said the new website would let staff post directly, and it was noted that some committees have expected the town office to type up their minutes.
- 2:05:41Select board comments on the Historic District Commission
Heather Roy named the name change as a priority and said the commission should stay involved in reviewing permits on historic property, citing the Parker Schoolhouse being permitted for demolition without the commission being informed. Josh Klein-Golden supported holding the ordinance changes for staff review before they come to the board.
- 2:16:40Select board comments on the Planning Board
Heather Roy asked that applicants who arrive unprepared be charged for the additional meeting, that infrastructure and trail systems be settled before subdivision approvals move forward, and raised applicants with multiple years of back taxes receiving permits. Joe Roy repeated that resource protection is the priority, saying the town's credibility depends on decisions following the data.
- 2:22:11Moratorium question and state law
Heather Roy asked whether a moratorium on permitting would let the town catch up. The town planner said Maine law requires a moratorium to address a specific identified problem, runs six months and can be extended, and cannot be a general pause; he also noted a declared moratorium forces that item to the top of the work list. A moratorium would go to the town to vote, possibly at a special town meeting.
- 2:27:34Workload, burnout and the comprehensive plan
Joe Roy said a list of priorities has to come down to two or three items and that boards risk burnout when applications take precedence over ordinance work. Heather Roy said the comprehensive plan dates from 2018, that the town has changed since, and that an update should be considered.
- 2:27:34Select board comments on solid waste
Heather Roy said her priority is composting and reduced tonnage in the interim before the five-year contract ends, with a stated reduction target such as 25 percent. Joe Roy said he wants the no-cost options explored first and raised the idea of a network connecting compost producers with people who would take it.
- 2:32:51Roadside dumping and storm brush
The committee chair said residents are asking what happens to trash dumped on roadsides, including a truckload left on Route 9. Jerry Douglass said Public Works should pick it up rather than wait on the state where it is within Durham. Residents are also asking whether the town will collect storm brush piles, and no answer was given.
- 2:38:45Town planner on capacity and consultants
The town planner said the annual town meeting format limits how quickly ordinance work can move, that public input during the process will require changes of direction, and that the state is now verifying resource protection data on a townwide basis rather than leaving the burden on individual landowners. He suggested hiring consultants to work with committees on discrete projects, noting communities he works for spend around $100,000 a year on planning projects.
What was decided
- 16:29Approve the RFP for legal services as written (moved by Joe Roy, seconded by Heather Roy)passed
- 27:09Place the town office tree removal, the GPCOG delegate appointments and the website contract on next week's agenda rather than deciding them tonighttabled
- 32:31Add the AP Warrant 5-06-24 and the meeting minutes from 4-23-24 to the consent agenda (moved by Joe Roy, seconded by Heather Roy)passed
- 32:31Accept the consent agenda as presented (moved by Josh Klein-Golden, seconded by Joe Tomm)passed
- 32:31Adjourn the meeting at 6:40pm (moved by Heather Roy, seconded by Joe Tomm)passed
An outcome reads "unclear" where the recording does not state it plainly. The recogniser drops short words, and "the motion does not carry" is one missing word from its opposite.
Motions the minutes record
The town's own written account of what was decided, taken from sb_meeting_minutes_5_07_24.txt. It owes nothing to the recording or to a model: the clerk typed it, with the vote. Where the summary above claims a decision this list does not carry, the summary is the part to doubt.
- approve the RFP as writtencarried 5-0
Moved by Joe Roy, seconded by Heather Roy
- add the AP Warrant 5-06-24 and the meeting minutes from 4-23-24 to the consent agendacarried 5-0
Moved by Joe Roy, seconded by Heather Roy
- accept the consent agenda as presentedcarried 5-0
Moved by Josh Klein-Golden, seconded by Joe Tomm
- adjourn the meeting at 6:40pmcarried 5-0
Moved by Heather Roy, seconded by Joe Tomm
Worth knowing
- 6:04Three residents of Runaround Pond Road (?) told the board the resource protection rezoning rested on unverified Blanding's turtle data. Lois Kilby-Chesley said a freedom of access request to Inland Fisheries and Wildlife returned the answer that there is no sustainable population of the turtle in Durham.
- 11:08The town attorney's firm stops providing services after May 31. The RFP goes out for a two-week response period and firms that submit are expected at the May 28 select board meeting.
- 21:34Paving of Auburn Pownal Road is being pulled because a CMP project will haul heavy equipment over it. CMP is posting a million dollar bond, the road will be filmed before and after, and the project could run up to a year depending on permitting.
- 27:09The proposed website change would cost $5,000 for three years against about $2,700 a year now. Separately, a quote of $3,500 was given to remove all ten pine trees in front of the town office.
Motion language found in the transcript
Located by pattern matching, with no model involved: "I move that", "I'll second", "all those in favour". This is an independent check on the summary above: 5 passages of motion language, against 5 decisions summarised.
Show the 5 passages
- 14:58this out ASAP um one thing that I did add at the request I think of Josh was what's involved that any firm or attorney submitting a proposal should be expected to be here on the 28th to answer questions MH so other than that this is pretty boiler plate uh with a lot of what other towns have used and I'm just looking for some guidance on what what you want to do awesome um so the way want to process this if anyone has any process or detail oriented questions for Jerry on this now would be a time to ask them and then we can entertain a motion to accept this format and then discuss any other minu · vote language: all in favor
- 17:25Jerry an entertaining motion to approve the RFP as written so moved do have a second second all right any additional discussion on the RFP as written right all in favor of the motion any opposition cool yes thank you yeah I agree with Josh don't want to be without Legal Services long at all so everyone be on · vote language: all in favor
- 33:21comfortable waiting if you feel like we need to move yeah okay okay um so want to remove from the consent to do we need an executive session no I would just add I I would have sorry I would have added the AP warrant and P warrant the cons set agenda We'll add that then is that a motion AP warrant and payal warrant um can I do just one other thing that we did get our meeting minutes correct from our last meeting and so can we just add that also the AP warrant payroll and meeting minutes from help me with the date just April 23rd y all right so I think we have to vote to add that to the consent · vote language: all in favor, opposed
- 34:36a motion to approve the consent agenda so moved second all right any discussion all in favor all opposed all righty and I would accept a motion to adjourn I'll make a motion to adjourn second all in favor any opposition all right adjourn · vote language: all in favor, opposed
- 2:40:40of it uh next week at our meeting and then if there's things that we feel like we have to take off but also still need to get done that's where we can start exploring other options to make sure we get them done and uh then we'll present it to each one of your organizations to take it take it and that will kind of be our policy objectives for the year so and like I said if you if after we do that you don't like the list that we're providing in terms of our expectations for each board and committee please reach out and then if we need to we can set up a separate oneon-one that board and committe
Elsewhere
Source & method
Town of Durham meeting recordings, YouTube auto-captions, and the town's written minutes
Captions cleaned into timestamped transcripts; topics and motions found by pattern matching; summaries written by a language model and required to cite the second each item begins. Every name attached to speech is checked against the attendance list in the minutes, and marked (?) where no record confirms it
https://www.youtube.com/@durhammaine/videos
Summary written by claude-opus-5. Attendance from sb_meeting_minutes_5_07_24.txt.
Data as of 25 August 2026 (the date of the newest recorded meeting in the index); retrieved 2 September 2026.
