Planning Board Meeting ~ January 3, 2024
The Planning Board held its regular January meeting, opening with the annual election of officers and acceptance of the December 6, 2023 minutes. Most of the meeting was a section-by-section review of the draft land use ordinance amendment on solar energy systems, drafted by the Conservation Commission, with Jess Costa and Michael Friendly present to describe how it was written. The board made five changes to the draft and then voted to recommend it to the Select Board. It also voted to accept a draft amendment to Article 18.4 listing the permit fees the Select Board may set, over the objection of the code enforcement officer, who argued for a shorter general clause instead of a list. George Thebarge reported on a consultant proposal to digitally codify the town's ordinances, and one resident spoke during public comment about the housing amendment. John Talbot said all three articles would go forward to the Select Board as a package and that the Planning Board would hold the formal public hearing in March.
What was discussed
- 0:45Election of officers and December minutes
John Talbot conducted a roll call and confirmed a quorum of five voting members. The board elected John Talbot as Chairperson and Juliet Caplinger as Vice Chairperson, and accepted the minutes of the December 6, 2023 meeting.
- 6:10Digital codification of the land use ordinance
George Thebarge reported on a meeting with the town manager, the code officer and John Talbot with a consultant proposing to digitise and codify the land use ordinance and other town ordinances. The work would include a language scrub and a legal scrub flagging provisions inconsistent with state law, and would identify gaps such as the absence of cell tower standards, but the consultant would not draft ordinances. Thebarge put the cost at roughly ten to twelve thousand dollars and the process at 18 months to two years once funded, with adoption at town meeting no earlier than April 2025.
- 11:36Public comment
A resident who gave his name as Nathan Ledger (?) told the board he had invested money based on information the town gave him more than a year ago and that the housing proposal has since changed. He said his only recourse is to pay fees to go before the board of appeals, and that the proposal would require him to buy more acreage. He also objected to how he was treated at the December public hearing.
- 16:44Housing diversity and density draft
John Talbot noted the board had already voted to forward this amendment to the Select Board at the December meeting, and asked only for formatting comments. A board member asked about section 5.1(C) on accessory apartments and the meaning of the main residence where there are two dwellings on a lot. George Thebarge said the maximum number of dwelling units per lot is three and that the wording confusion is the kind of thing the legal scrub would flag. No change was made.
- 21:55How the solar draft was written
Jess Costa said the Conservation Commission spent about six months on the draft, reviewing ordinances from other Maine towns, Maine Audubon guidance, and meeting with the Topsham conservation and energy commissions. A town information meeting was held December 7 and comments were reviewed at the commission's December 20 meeting. Michael Friendly said a mitigation fee for arrays on ecologically valuable land, and discouraging arrays on prime farmland, were tabled for lack of time.
- 27:09Exemption threshold raised to 8,000 square feet
George Thebarge said rooftop and small ground-mounted systems are exempt from board review. The initial exemption limit of 2,000 square feet of surface area was raised to 8,000 square feet by the Conservation Commission after solar developers testified it was too restrictive; Thebarge compared 8,000 square feet to the town office parking lot, which he put at about 7,200 square feet.
- 32:51Review levels and districts
Medium scale systems, between 8,000 and 20,000 square feet of surface area, go to the planning board for site plan review. Anything over 20,000 square feet goes first for conditional use review and then site plan review. Solar would be allowed only in the rural residential agricultural district and the aquifer protection overlay.
- 37:55What counts as surface area
The board debated whether surface area should include access ways, the space between panel rows, fencing, inverters and transformers, and whether the calculation should use panel tilt. Members argued the threshold is only a trigger for review and should be simple to apply.
- 43:12Cumberland example and the code officer's view
George Thebarge showed the site plan for an installation on Route One in Cumberland: 20,000 square feet of panel surface area, about 40,000 square feet of ground including the rows between arrays, and about 1.57 acres within the fence. Alan Plummer said he would be the one doing the calculation in the office and that he did not want to be computing tangents. Thebarge said Topsham measures at maximum tilt.
- 1:00:42Visual impact assessment and vegetation management
Juliet Caplinger asked whether a registered landscape architect should be required for the visual impact assessment or only for the vegetation management plan. George Thebarge said the landscape architect is needed because the assessment covers how visual impact will be mitigated through buffer design. He confirmed the vegetation management plan had been extended to cover the buffer outside the fence as well as vegetation inside it.
- 1:06:32Lighting standards
Brian Lanoie asked whether fixtures should be required to be dark sky compliant and whether a photometric plan should be required. George Thebarge read the existing item 10, which requires shielded, downward-directed, full cut-off fixtures, and said a full lighting analysis would be excessive for a solar site. No change was made.
- 1:11:48Decommissioning and enforcement over the life of a project
Members asked who tracks the decommissioning plan and the five-year updates to the financial guarantee. George Thebarge said the code officer reviews and enforces it, and that on any change of ownership the new owner must certify awareness of the requirements. Alan Plummer said such projects change hands rapidly, citing three sites in Mechanic Falls, one of which changed twice in a year, and asked that the code officer's duties on transfer be spelled out in one place.
- 1:17:07Vegetated buffer and noise separation
Tyler Hutchison asked what the boundary line of a solar project site means for the 50-foot vegetated buffer; George Thebarge said the buffer applies to the project area, not the whole property. Hutchison then said the 400-foot noise separation should not be limited to inverters and transformers because other equipment may generate noise.
- 1:27:32Roof-mounted definition and 100-foot setback
The board removed the phrase about tilting toward the south at an optimal angle from the roof mounted or building integrated definition. Juliet Caplinger then asked what equipment the 100-foot property line setback in C1 applies to; George Thebarge said the fence is set at 50 feet and the setback applies to the solar development itself. The word solar was added to C1.
- 1:33:02Land use table line 44
John Talbot asked whether the land use table should show site plan review alongside code enforcement review for medium scale solar, so an applicant sees the requirement in one place. George Thebarge said the same omission runs through the whole table and warned the change could imply the requirement applies only to solar. Alan Plummer argued for making the one line correct now, and said afterwards he had persuaded at least one member who had intended to vote against it.
- 1:38:21Emergency services plan and battery storage
John Talbot noted item 10 requires an emergency services plan acceptable to the fire chief. Juliet Caplinger asked what would apply to a standalone battery storage facility; George Thebarge said the solar standards would not cover it and it would be handled as a conditional use, and that the Conservation Commission was asked not to take on battery storage in this draft.
- 1:43:48Recommendation of the solar amendment
A member asked whether a building permit is required; George Thebarge said generally only an electrical permit, unless there is a building or a road cut. John Talbot then read back the five changes the board had made and moved to recommend the draft to the Select Board.
- 1:48:54Article 18.4 permit fees
George Thebarge explained that the 2022 town meeting moved fee setting out of the land use ordinance into a separate schedule the Select Board can amend, but the town attorney advised that a new fee must first be authorised at town meeting. The draft would list the current fees and add occupancy permits, subdivision sketch plan, amended subdivision, Shoreland zoning, solar energy systems, driveway permits and e911 permits.
- 1:54:30Disagreement over listing fees
Alan Plummer said he and George Thebarge disagree on this. Plummer argued a list must be maintained and will be missed when new ordinances are added, and that a single sentence saying the Select Board may set a fee for anything referenced in the land use ordinance would be simpler. Thebarge said the attorney's opinion requires the fee to be referenced in the ordinance and that listing them in Article 18 does that in one place rather than in twenty. The board went with the list.
- 2:11:03Public hearing schedule
After the vote a board member said public comment should have been opened on the fee article before the vote; John Talbot invited comment and none was offered, and said residents could email the board or the Select Board. Talbot said all three articles go to the Select Board as a package, and that the Planning Board must hold the formal public hearing no more than 30 days and no fewer than seven days before the April 6 town meeting, so sometime in March.
- 2:16:38Cell tower fee and adjournment
John Talbot said the Select Board should set differential conditional use permit fees for uses such as cell towers, home businesses and solar, and asked Alan Plummer and George Thebarge to work with them on it. George Thebarge said any fee must be justified by what the service costs the town. The board then adjourned.
What was decided
- 0:45Nominate John Talbot as Chairperson (moved by Allan Purinton, seconded by Brian Lanoie); carried 4-0-1 with Talbot abstaining.passed
- 0:45Nominate Juliet Caplinger as Vice Chairperson (moved by John Talbot, seconded by Allan Purinton); carried 5-0.passed
- 0:45Accept the December 6, 2023 meeting minutes (moved by Allan Purinton, seconded by Juliet Caplinger); carried 5-0.passed
- 1:00:42Change the definition of solar energy system surface area to be the total surface area of all solar energy panels (moved by John Talbot, seconded by Allan Purinton); carried 4-1.passed
- 1:22:25Amend paragraph 11 to say all noise generating equipment must be at least 400 feet from any residence, with a 400-foot radius indicated from the noise generating equipment shown on the site plan (moved by John Talbot, seconded by Juliet Caplinger); carried 5-0.passed
- 1:27:32Change the definition of solar energy system, roof mounted or building integrated, to remove the phrase about tilting toward the south at an optimal angle (moved by Tyler Hutchison, seconded by Allan Purinton); carried 5-0.passed
- 1:27:32Change C1 to say all solar equipment shall be placed at least 100 feet from any property line (moved by Juliet Caplinger, seconded by Tyler Hutchison); carried 5-0.passed
- 1:38:21Add site plan review (SPR) alongside code enforcement review on line 44 of the land use table for medium scale solar in the rural residential agricultural district and the aquifer protection overlay, and define SPR in the table (moved by John Talbot, seconded by Tyler Hutchison); carried 5-0.passed
- 1:48:54Recommend to the Select Board that it approve the solar draft amendment as presented with the Planning Board's changes (moved by John Talbot, seconded by Tyler Hutchison); carried 5-0.passed
- 2:11:03Accept the Article 18.4 permit application submission requirements as presented (moved by Allan Purinton, seconded by Juliet Caplinger); carried 5-0.passed
- 2:16:38Adjourn the meeting (moved by Tyler Hutchison, seconded by Brian Lanoie); carried 5-0.passed
An outcome reads "unclear" where the recording does not state it plainly. The recogniser drops short words, and "the motion does not carry" is one missing word from its opposite.
Motions the minutes record
The town's own written account of what was decided, taken from pbminutes_01_03_2024.txt. It owes nothing to the recording or to a model: the clerk typed it, with the vote. Where the summary above claims a decision this list does not carry, the summary is the part to doubt.
- nominate John Talbot as Chairpersoncarried 4-0-1
Moved by Allan Purinton, seconded by Brian Lanoie
- nominate Juliet Caplinger as Vice Chairpersoncarried 5-0
Moved by John Talbot, seconded by Allan Purinton
- accept the December 6th, 2023 meeting minutescarried 5-0
Moved by Allan Purinton, seconded by Juliet Caplinger
- change the definition of solar energy system surface area to be the total surface area of all solar energy panelscarried 4-1
Moved by John Talbot, seconded by Allan Purinton
- paragraph 11 will say, all noise generating equipment must be at least 400 feet from any residence within a 400-foot radius indicator from the noise generating equipment shown on the site plancarried 5-0
Moved by John Talbot, seconded by Juliet Caplinger
- change the definition of solar energy system roof mounted or building integrated to remove “toward the south at an optimal angle” from the first sentencecarried 5-0
Moved by Tyler Hutchison, seconded by Allan Purinton
- change C1 to say all solar equipment shall be placed at least 100 feet from any property linecarried 5-0
Moved by Juliet Caplinger, seconded by Tyler Hutchison
- add under line 44 of land uses in Column RRA add an ampersand and site plan review (SPR) and on the table define SPR means Planning Board Site Plan Reviewcarried 5-0
Moved by John Talbot, seconded by Tyler Hutchison
- recommend to the Select Board to approve the solar draft amendment as presented with the Planning Board changes for consideration at the April Town Meetingcarried 5-0
Moved by John Talbot, seconded by Tyler Hutchison
- the Planning Board accept 18.4 permit application submission requirements as presentedcarried 5-0
Moved by Allan Purinton, seconded by Juliet Caplinger
- adjourn the meetingcarried 5-0
Moved by Tyler Hutchison, seconded by Brian Lanoie
Worth knowing
- 0:45George Thebarge reported the code officer's year-end figures showed 20 new single family housing starts in calendar 2023. The threshold that triggers a look at the comprehensive plan is 45.
- 27:09The exemption from planning board review for solar was raised from 2,000 square feet of surface area to 8,000 square feet after solar developers testified at the December 7 public information meeting that the lower figure was too restrictive.
- 11:36A resident who gave his name as Nathan Ledger (?) told the board he committed money with investors and banks based on what the town told him over a year ago, that the proposal has changed twice since, and that his only recourse now costs him further fees.
- 2:11:03The Planning Board must hold the formal public hearing on these three articles in March, no more than 30 days and no fewer than seven days before the April 6 town meeting. The drafts are posted on the town website.
Motion language found in the transcript
Located by pattern matching, with no model involved: "I move that", "I'll second", "all those in favour". This is an independent check on the summary above: 6 passages of motion language, against 11 decisions summarised.
Show the 6 passages
- 12:32start I don't have much time and I'm just kind of I'm speechless I don't have the right words and I'm kind of insulted um and I should have been here at the last meeting to discuss this because it seems that you've already made a motion to pass the amendment and uh when I was would I say cut off or wasn't allowed uh the time that I had every time I was told that I wasn't recognized the amount of time went to the select board the select board members that were there were able to ask questions ask follow-up questions make suggestions and everything else so it seems like the proposal that you're
- 55:08yeah they use square a lot of the examples we looked at used square footage for the size scales okay but I do see that we added back in or maybe it was already in that we are requesting the size of the project yes in megaw yes yeah so I will it's time we have a motion in a second I'll second it just to discuss so the motion is to change the definition of solar energy system surface area to be the total surface area of all solar energy panels correct that is the motion but it is open for discussion um my concern with removing any association with access ways and structures is if they do have a
- 1:26:19tilted is separate does that they tilted to the north yeah why can be tilted okay would you like to make a motion to that effect I'm tired I yeah sorry okay that was the last one too so great um I would like to make a motion to change the definition of solar energy system roof mounted or building integrated to uh remove toward the south at an optimal · vote language: all those in favor
- 1:29:33energized maybe just solar solar equipment maybe just adding that in just add the word solar solar energy equipment do we have a motion yeah I'll make I'll make that motion to change C1 to say all solar equipment shall be placed at least 100t from any property line I will second seconded uh move and seconded any further discussion seeing none please raise a hand if you agree or accept uh unanimous Alan I'm off I had · vote language: unanimous
- 2:09:18we can then ask the codification folks is there a simpler there the lawyer is going to look at it could we use this sentence as a catchall on paragraph one of the article or how do we write that or do we do we just keep doing this I'll make a motion that we accept 18.4 permit application submission requirements as
- 2:18:10select board acted on it around October or November so but the truth J we no longer you interims gone and and so yeah I mean but it's at their their Pace I mean they depends on a lot of factors but you know I don't I would bet it's it can't officially announce it until this is approved yep okay thank you all very much official no we need a motion I was thinking Him in Advance do I have a motion to adjourn I will make a motion to adjourn and a second second I think we're done I don't think we need do we need let just to be honest approved this is yours hey thank you all very much for your time
Elsewhere
Source & method
Town of Durham meeting recordings, YouTube auto-captions, and the town's written minutes
Captions cleaned into timestamped transcripts; topics and motions found by pattern matching; summaries written by a language model and required to cite the second each item begins. Every name attached to speech is checked against the attendance list in the minutes, and marked (?) where no record confirms it
https://www.youtube.com/@durhammaine/videos
Summary written by claude-opus-5. Attendance from pbminutes_01_03_2024.txt.
Data as of 25 August 2026 (the date of the newest recorded meeting in the index); retrieved 2 September 2026.
